Jump to content

Steve Bruce


Demitri_C

Recommended Posts

bloody sky sports reporter for the second night on the row said that there were riots when Bruce joined Villa and saying Villa fans tried to break the gates at Villa park! 😡 🤣

Edited by villaluke
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, villaluke said:

bloody sky sports reporter for the second night on the row said that there were riots when Bruce joined Villa and saying Villa fans tried to break the gates at Villa park! 😡 🤣

Bruce media mates can spin anything. Makes him even more detestable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Shropshire Lad said:

He has since acknowledged his mistake to be fair to him.

 

Too late though isn't it once it's been said on television.

It's like a newspaper making up a headline story and then adding a two paragraph apology on page 16 two weeks later.....

True journalism is absolutely dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bannedfromHandV said:

Too late though isn't it once it's been said on television.

It's like a newspaper making up a headline story and then adding a two paragraph apology on page 16 two weeks later.....

True journalism is absolutely dead.

Agreed.

Besides he seems to think he just got the managers mixed up, the protest about McLeish was nothing like he described.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Shropshire Lad said:

He has since acknowledged his mistake to be fair to him.

 

**** him.  Damage done.  Make the mistake on national TV and then apologise via twitter.  **** Fox News methods in full flow.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Shropshire Lad said:

He has since acknowledged his mistake to be fair to him.

 

He’s still lying anyway. There was a bit of disapproval when McLiesh was appointed but nothing close to what he’s describing 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I didn’t say he should be absolved totally guys. Just that he’s been called out on it and he’s responded to it. I wouldn’t have expected any sort of acknowledgement of an error, certainly not on television.

I don’t pay a great deal of attention to the musings of sky sports pundits, I only heard of this because of seeing it on Villareport or some such, just wanted to add that further development towards the discussion.  

Anyway, that Steve Bruce fella, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shropshire Lad said:

Ok, I didn’t say he should be absolved totally guys. Just that he’s been called out on it and he’s responded to it. I wouldn’t have expected any sort of acknowledgement of an error, certainly not on television.

I don’t pay a great deal of attention to the musings of sky sports pundits, I only heard of this because of seeing it on Villareport or some such, just wanted to add that further development towards the discussion.  

Anyway, that Steve Bruce fella, eh?

:D The anger was in no way directed at you just so you know :thumb:  rocket polisher knew exactly what he was doing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BOF said:

:D The anger was in no way directed at you just so you know :thumb:  rocket polisher knew exactly what he was doing.

:lol: I wasn’t taking it as anger or vitriol, I just aware that I’d found myself edging closer than ever before to being seen as Rob Dorsett’s advocate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TrentVilla said:

Agreed.

Besides he seems to think he just got the managers mixed up, the protest about McLeish was nothing like he described.

Also, Bruce being hated by the fans for his SHA association is a narrative Sky has been pushing for a couple of years now. That was no mistake, he just took the lie too far for plausible deniability is all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â