Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don’t agree with people on social media referring to Keith’s body shape. I prefer to refer to his baldy slaphead or his ugly saggy chops or his slimy personality.

Sling your hook baldy! ..and take your Alexa with you!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Deisler123 said:

This is funny. I read a report from a Chinese website that some ITK from Villa club said that Wyness fabricated all this for a potential 1M compensation if the club is re-sold.

I didn't believe it, therefore didn't post it here.

http://finance.eastday.com/m/20180608/u1ai11508942.html

And now he asked for 6M? F off. 

I think the 6m was his waist size when they were doing the suits for wembley  - they run of material so he resigned. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, hippo said:

I think the 6m was his waist size when they were doing the suits for wembley  - they run of material so he resigned. 

That's the most plausible thing I've read since this whole thing started :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Zatman said:

Finally this can be moved to Other Football :P 

You can say that again!

Obviously we still don't know all the facts, but it's beginning to look more and more like Wyness was the villain here. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Zatman said:

Maybe he was when he was employed by us but since he was suspended he said **** them

So he goes from being an altruistic guardian of the great name of Aston Villa to being a c*^t a few days later?

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TheAuthority said:

So he goes from being an altruistic guardian of the great name of Aston Villa to being a c*^t a few days later?

:rolleyes:

Whilst a director of the company, he'd have had director's duties regarding AVFC Ltd. Once removed as a director, he no longer has those duties imposed upon him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TheAuthority said:

So he goes from being an altruistic guardian of the great name of Aston Villa to being a c*^t a few days later?

:rolleyes:

 

13 minutes ago, snowychap said:

Whilst a director of the company, he'd have had director's duties regarding AVFC Ltd. Once removed as a director, he no longer has those duties imposed upon him.

I see. So that's when and why he started acting like a c*^t.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, TheAuthority said:

 

I see. So that's when and why he started acting like a c*^t.

I have no idea if that happened and if so when it did.

It may well be the case that he acted contrary to his duties as a director. It may also be that he didn't. Either way, being a director of the company or not being a director of the company is an importantly different circumstance.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, snowychap said:

I have no idea if that happened and if so when it did.

It may well be the case that he acted contrary to his duties as a director. It may also be that he didn't. Either way, being a director of the company or not being a director of the company is an importantly different circumstance.

:D Thanks for pointing that out.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of use Terms of Use, Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Â