Jump to content

Keith Wyness


villan-scott
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, sne said:

And if we build a casino we could give Gabby, Lescott and our other has been's that we can't get rid of jobs as greeters standing around in roman costumes telling visitors about our deluxe specials.

 

run out of likes but,lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, sne said:

And if we build a casino we could give Gabby, Lescott and our other has been's that we can't get rid of jobs as greeters standing around in roman costumes telling visitors about our deluxe specials.

 

Just don't hire them as blackjack dealers; they'll lose every time, an omen that appears wherever they go! ;) 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20 June 2016 at 21:04, thunderball said:

Dream scenario for me would be x4 distinct stands with a sliding  roof & pitch. Build a hotel on the land between the holte & pub. Then we will have a super duper all purpose stadium with excellent transport links and can host concerts/trade shows/boxing etc all year round, not just in the off season. With the hallowed turf protected, the stadium could create a lot more revenue on non match days. 

I heard from someone who works at Atkins engineering about Randy's previous plans and he said they were similar to Chelsea's shed end with an inbuilt club shop, museum, conference centre, a hotel, a casino, a Burger King and a massage parlour.

 

 

Only one massage parlour! Xia out! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2016 at 16:29, meme said:

Just don't hire them as blackjack dealers; they'll lose every time, an omen that appears wherever they go! ;) 

Or just let them gamble there and pay their wages back into the club. Free players, job done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, hippo said:

Should we be worried that we have heard nothing on this for around 10 days when it was supposed to be done ?  - is he our CEO or not ?

The FA bloke will be back home from France today so I'd expect it to be sorted within another week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


19 minutes ago, villan-scott said:

I'm going with yes...

I'll go with no so just to keep it interesting...

Then at least one of us can say "I've always said this was going to be the case" or similar after the event.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats the difference between him being an employee and a director ?  - I mean if we appoint a technical director - he won't be subject F+P  - So could we just call Wyness 'Operational Manager'  and bypass the F+P tests ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


7 hours ago, hippo said:

Whats the difference between him being an employee and a director ?  - I mean if we appoint a technical director - he won't be subject F+P  - So could we just call Wyness 'Operational Manager'  and bypass the F+P tests ?

Real company Directors have legal obligations regarding the company and need to be registered with Companies House. I think a "Technical Director" is just in name only 

Edited by mwj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of use Terms of Use, Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Â