limpid

Amusing Gifs Thread 2016 NSFW

781 posts in this topic

Posted

I've had to remove the old thread. One of the advertisers just sent takedown notices for a bunch of images in it. Also, most of the links are broken especially from the early pages.

Please make sure that you've read what the guidelines say about acceptable images (particularly the link to Google).

NSFW does not mean "anything goes" It just means think about what you're doing if you open this at work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Panic3.jpg

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Gotta love the 'free' market!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

5yRooB.gif

I made this one, so you can have it back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

tumblr_mmuo89e2AU1qcls7xo1_r2_500.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If we're starting again, then let's go back to the start.

Originally posted by some bloke called Tim Berners Lee, 2nd January 1990

puQNst2.gif

 

 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

VxC8Fli.gif

 

 

From the original thread first post

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

uRHiyrg.gifMVPdV4a.gif

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

12 hours ago, limpid said:

I've had to remove the old thread. One of the advertisers just sent takedown notices for a bunch of images in it. Also, most of the links are broken especially from the early pages.

Please make sure that you've read what the guidelines say about acceptable images (particularly the link to Google).

NSFW does not mean "anything goes" It just means think about what you're doing if you open this at work.

a link to the guidelines would be helpful too. i looked around and couldnt find them. i post alot of garbage so i probably need to read it properly :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

7 hours ago, tomaspg said:

a link to the guidelines would be helpful too. i looked around and couldnt find them. i post alot of garbage so i probably need to read it properly :)

In addition to the one in the "browse" menu on every page? :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

11 hours ago, tomaspg said:

uRHiyrg.gif

 

Nope nope nope noppity nope nope. Nope.
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yeah, **** that noise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

22 hours ago, chrisp65 said:

If we're starting again, then let's go back to the start.

Originally posted by some bloke called Tim Berners Lee, 2nd January 1990

puQNst2.gif

 

 

TECHNO VIKING!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

de43313f71c4e2207d99d29f4b367fad.gif

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yep, techno viking, the longer version on youtube is still worth a watch once in a while.

**this is not a pop at rules Limpid and the mods (shit band) have to constantly try and watch for, just an observation:

The techno viking gif is, I think, completely ok with the rules you can see by following the links. But it's a bloke with more skin than clothing showing and doing a bit of a dance. I suspect, that if that was a female, in a bikini top, so therefore more covered / less skin then it would not be acceptable to some advertisers.

Not the fault of VT, just fascinating, the world we live in.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

tumblr_mk9xmsUbHR1r5ur0ho1_500.gif

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

17 minutes ago, chrisp65 said:

Yep, techno viking, the longer version on youtube is still worth a watch once in a while.

**this is not a pop at rules Limpid and the mods (shit band) have to constantly try and watch for, just an observation:

The techno viking gif is, I think, completely ok with the rules you can see by following the links. But it's a bloke with more skin than clothing showing and doing a bit of a dance. I suspect, that if that was a female, in a bikini top, so therefore more covered / less skin then it would not be acceptable to some advertisers.

Not the fault of VT, just fascinating, the world we live in.

I think a lot of the detection is done by automated processes. The fleshy bits being so hard to pick out against the background in that image mean that I suspect that the bots wouldn't pick up a person in that image male or female. A bikini top might actually easier to detect than a topless picture.

Please let this be the last post on the subject in this topic. Start a new topic if you want to discuss it. I think people know that I'd rather move the site to a subscription model and remove the ads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

5654646_zpstlcsx5mq.gif

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

9 hours ago, limpid said:

In addition to the one in the "browse" menu on every page? :) 

never noticed that :D cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.