DCJonah Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 Why do Garde's team selections make perfect sense compared to Sherwood's? Bacuna in cm. Richardson as an attacking winger. The constant use of Sinclair. Starting games with a negative approach. I really don't see much difference. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arj Guy Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 6 minutes ago, Richard said: So Sherwood wasn't as bad? As Garde? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 18 minutes ago, Arj Guy said: As Garde? As was being made out at the time. That's the logical extension to the point you made 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arj Guy Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 4 minutes ago, Richard said: As was being made out at the time. That's the logical extension to the point you made Imo there is very little if anything to justify Garde being better than Sherwood. Sherwood staying was not an option though 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 Why would anyone expect Garde to be better than Sherwood anyway? See they were both appointed by the sa,e incompetent imbeciles. People who have appointed failure, have a failed culture and philosophy and still appoint based on that failed thinking. Sherwood was a bad manager and a bad appointment and Garde is a bad manager and bad appointment t because of that. Why would you expect those ruining the club to get it right in terms of appointment? You give them credit they do not deserve. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 3 minutes ago, Arj Guy said: Imo there is very little if anything to justify Garde being better than Sherwood. Sherwood staying was not an option though I absolutely agree with both of those statements but people need to be careful in their arguments. when Sherwood was here people said he was crap, and he was, and that he should have got more out of the players and he should. Now to say that the players aren't that good and there is no more to get out of them sort of excuses Sherwoo. see players = crap then Sherwood not so much to blame players = not that good but could do more then Sherwood was bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 3 minutes ago, Richard said: Why would anyone expect Garde to be better than Sherwood anyway? See they were both appointed by the sa,e incompetent imbeciles. People who have appointed failure, have a failed culture and philosophy and still appoint based on that failed thinking. Sherwood was a bad manager and a bad appointment and Garde is a bad manager and bad appointment t because of that. Why would you expect those ruining the club to get it right in terms of appointment? You give them credit they do not deserve. This is such bizarre reasoning. I get why you would think Garde is a bad appointment but according to what you just wrote there you seem to think Garde is a bad appointment because the people running the club make bad decisions? That's not really how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilchard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 6 minutes ago, Richard said: Why would anyone expect Garde to be better than Sherwood anyway? See they were both appointed by the sa,e incompetent imbeciles. People who have appointed failure, have a failed culture and philosophy and still appoint based on that failed thinking. Sherwood was a bad manager and a bad appointment and Garde is a bad manager and bad appointment t because of that. Why would you expect those ruining the club to get it right in terms of appointment? You give them credit they do not deserve. Thing is...going on that - why boot Garde as we'll only end up with another one out of their depth with the same people making the decisions. Just a never ending circle of shite ain't it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 1 minute ago, Pilchard said: Thing is...going on that - why boot Garde as we'll only end up with another one out of their depth with the same people making the decisions. Just a never ending circle of shite ain't it Yes that's the problem! He is a poor manager and we are stuck with him for various reasons , that being one of them 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 6 minutes ago, Mantis said: This is such bizarre reasoning. I get why you would think Garde is a bad appointment but according to what you just wrote there you seem to think Garde is a bad appointment because the people running the club make bad decisions? That's not really how it works. Not just that , the results have been shit too. But not sure why you think it bizarre. They can't make a decent decision to save their lives what makes anyone think this is any different ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 Just now, Richard said: Not just that , the results have been shit too. But not sure why you think it bizarre. They can't make a decent decision to save their lives what makes anyone think this is any different ? Because it's ridiculous reasoning. Whether or not an appointment isn't based on who made it but rather how they perform. Obviously Garde's not performing well at the moment and I understand why you think he's a bad appointment but if he is a bad appointment it's because he's not getting results, not because of the people who hired him. How is that even relevant? Going by your logic we could appoint a world class manager and they'd still be a bad appointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 It's relevant because they need to have a level of competence to appoint someone. You have errors do by saying going by my logic, no you have not looked at it correctly. Going by my logic they would not have the competence to appoint a world class manager . It's not that they appoint someone and they then become bad because of who has appointed them it is that they are already bad before they join and those appointing them are not seeing it and are making bad decisions. It's pretty straightforward really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingman Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 4 hours ago, Blasterpocket68 said: Shit post Shite Response Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 2 minutes ago, Richard said: It's relevant because they need to have a level of competence to appoint someone. You have errors do by saying going by my logic, no you have not looked at it correctly. Going by my logic they would not have the competence to appoint a world class manager . It's not that they appoint someone and they then become bad because of who has appointed them it is that they are already bad before they join and those appointing them are not seeing it and are making bad decisions. It's pretty straightforward really Can you not see where I'm coming from here? You're acting as if it's impossible that they could appoint a good manager even by accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 No i see where you are coming from, but you obviously can't see where I'm coming from. They are crap, they make crap decisions, they would not make a good decision even by accident. I do not trust them to appoint a good manager because they do not have the competence to recognise one, approach one or negotiate with one. Any decent manager would have certain demands that would not fit into the failed culture that exists at the club so they would not appoint one by accident Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingman Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 1 hour ago, Supervillan78 said: This club is a turd. Sherwood and Garde just have different ways of polishing it. You can't polish a turd!.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blasterpocket68 Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 8 minutes ago, Kingman said: Shite Response If you read further on you will notice I responded further !!!!!! Lol it's the muppet show tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 6 minutes ago, Richard said: No i see where you are coming from, but you obviously can't see where I'm coming from. They are crap, they make crap decisions, they would not make a good decision even by accident. I do not trust them to appoint a good manager because they do not have the competence to recognise one, approach one or negotiate with one. Any decent manager would have certain demands that would not fit into the failed culture that exists at the club so they would not appoint one by accident I can, I just don't agree with this bizarre view you have that it's physically impossible for them to make the right appointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingman Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 Have to admit Remi is clueless, out of his depth and dose not deserve the abuse. IMO Just another pawn set up to fail that directs the immediate flak away from the unqualified board! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villanun Posted January 9, 2016 Share Posted January 9, 2016 1 hour ago, Zatman said: I love how Garde threw the players under the bus today like Sherwood did (similar enough comments as well) and not a mention of it on here He said that the players need to be braver and that confidence comes from inside. I wouldn't say that's throwing the players under the bus - I mean, do you disagree with him? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts