Xela Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Harj (that ITK on Twitter) says Lennon isn't our preferred option. In the pantheon of twitter bullshitters, where does he stand? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimzk5 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Harj (that ITK on Twitter) says Lennon isn't our preferred option. In the pantheon of twitter bullshitters, where does he stand? Fairly reliable, he said cleverley was still on after the window closed amongst other things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaForever1970 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Lennon doesnt want to come here?Shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supervillan78 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 (edited) Isn't Townsend first choice anyway? Edited August 9, 2015 by Supervillan78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 In the pantheon of twitter bullshitters, where does he stand? He's the only one on there worth listening to I'd say. He came to notice last summer when he called our interest in Ki and Sanchez. Doesn't post very often. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xela Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Harj (that ITK on Twitter) says Lennon isn't our preferred option. In the pantheon of twitter bullshitters, where does he stand? Fairly reliable, he said cleverley was still on after the window closed amongst other things To be fair you don't need to be Mystic Meg to see that Lennon wasn't the preferred option / first choice considering Traore was here last week being shown around Lennon strikes me as about 5th in the queue of right wingers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Lennon doesnt want to come here?Shame. No, he's saying that he isn't our preferred target and that Spuds want too much for him anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xela Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 In the pantheon of twitter bullshitters, where does he stand? He's the only one on there worth listening to I'd say. He came to notice last summer when he called our interest in Ki and Sanchez. Doesn't post very often. Fair enough, sounds like he isn't an attention seeker like some (most) on there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodytom Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Not overwhelmed by this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Not overwhelmed by this one. Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodytom Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Not overwhelmed by this one. Why not? Just don't rate him all that much. Certainly don't expect to be paying 5m for a player who can't make a 25 man squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Not overwhelmed by this one.Why not? Just don't rate him all that much. Certainly don't expect to be paying 5m for a player who can't make a 25 man squad. Fair enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supervillan78 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Not bothered that he can't get in Tottenham's squad. If he can get into ours and make a difference (which I believe he could) then that's all that matters IMO. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shillzz Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Don't need him. We already have Gabby, Ayew, Grealish, Sinclair & Gil who can play wide / forward. I suppose it gives us options for playing 442, but still not a priority for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briny_ear Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Will be very pleased if we get him, preferred option or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supervillan78 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 (edited) Don't need him. We already have Gabby, Ayew, Grealish, Sinclair & Gil who can play wide / forward. I suppose it gives us options for playing 442, but still not a priority for me. Personally I think that Gabby's not really a winger and both Gil and Grealish are more effective in central roles. Ayew's going to need a little time to adjust, and Sinclair didn't exactly have his best game for us yesterday. IMO Lennon could be a very important player for us, should Tim decide to bring him in. Edited August 9, 2015 by Supervillan78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post StanBalaban Posted August 9, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted August 9, 2015 As long as he's as happy signing for us as he was for Everton on loan, then i'm happy The epitome of happiness Ha ha, imagine him and Senderlols together, misery utd. I think £5m for Lennon would be great business, and would add another attacking option. Win/win for me. 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osmark86 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 dopamine surge on them two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 Don't need him. We already have Gabby, Ayew, Grealish, Sinclair & Gil who can play wide / forward. I suppose it gives us options for playing 442, but still not a priority for me. We need a genuine winger. Grealish and Gil are suited to wider roles only in a narrow set-up. Ayew had the only half-decent season of his career playing as a forward. Sinclair is a decent goalscorer but doesn't create much and Gabby is crap. Yesterday we played a 4-5-1 for the most part I thought - the wide players doubling with the full-backs in the defensive phases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biskitt Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 (edited) Don't need him. We already have Gabby, Ayew, Grealish, Sinclair & Gil who can play wide / forward. I suppose it gives us options for playing 442, but still not a priority for me.We need a genuine winger. Grealish and Gil are suited to wider roles only in a narrow set-up. Ayew had the only half-decent season of his career playing as a forward. Sinclair is a decent goalscorer but doesn't create much and Gabby is crap. Yesterday we played a 4-5-1 for the most part I thought - the wide players doubling with the full-backs in the defensive phases. I agree, we have players who can play wide but we don't have anyone that is a typical "get to the byline and cross it" type winger. Not saying we should play with that type of player every game but would certainly like that option in the squad. Someone like Montero would be nice! Edited August 9, 2015 by Biskitt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts