Jump to content

The ISIS threat to Europe


Ads

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Awol said:

Yep. If not for blind luck and the bravery of a few off duty squaddies on a train this would be the second mass attack in Europe in two months. 

I think Merkel could find herself in real trouble now, the Germans have literally no idea who is in their country and they are still rolling in at the rate of 10,000 per day. In reality the overwhelming majority are decent people fleeing hell, but they won't all be (as we now know with a degree of confidence) and 5-6 guys can cause absolute carnage.  

Schengen is already in tatters, this might be the thing that kills it completely. Once free movement goes it's all downhill from there. 

 

I agree with all apart from the last sentence. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Awol said:

I'll give this one more go and if it's still not clear to you then let's call it quits.

Yes of course Wahhabism is the foundation of the Saudi State in partnership with the Al Saud dynasty. 

Wahhabism is the theological doctrine that underpins the nastier Jihadi movements - see video clip linked earlier for evidence.

Therefore Saudi Arabia is really indivisible from Al Qaeda, Islamic State et al,  except for the leadership issue - the Al Saud believe they should be in charge and Al Baghdadi reckons he's the gaffer in waiting, before him Bin Laden quite fancied the job. 

That's the basic conflict between the Saud/Wahhabi establishment and IS/AQ, the actual religious belief systems are the same - more golden delicious vs Granny Smiths than comparing apples and oranges.

Saudi Arabia is the ideological inspiration for modern Jihadi terrorism and that is the cancer that the world needs to deal with.

That is not generalising about Muslims or Arabs, only a Saudi would be conceited enough to believe that a criticism of their own deeply malevolent and medieval world view represented a criticism of all Muslims or Arabs.

Wahhabism is good old fascism dressed up in religious garb - and without the snappy uniforms. It needs to be treated by the world in exactly the same manner and utterly destroyed. 

I can't believe how many inaccurate views you have expressed as facts in this post. And please don't make up a new expression called "jihadi terrorism". Jihad is something different from terrorism and they can't be put together. Like heavenly hell. Or white black. There is no such thing.

To put it short. There are two big powers on the Middle East that stirs the pot (Saudi Arabia and Iran), along with some smaller ones (Bahrain, Iraq) and some "independent" groups like ISIS, AL-Qaida, Al-Nusra, Hizbollah. These "independent" groups are supported by the big and small powers in the Middle East and big and small powers in the west, in this case USA (and CIA), Britain, Russia, China etc... A nice melting pot. Along that, you have a Israel with its own stirring spoon. How do you want to get rid of wahhabism? Can you get rid of Catholicism the same way? No. And even if wahhabism goes away, will life for Sunni Muslims in Iraq get better or will it get even worse than it was before ISIS came? You do know that ISIS came about because of the Iraqi shia rule that made no room for Sunni Muslims that were powerless and poor after the US invasion?

Please don't simplify it to just blame on the Saudis or Iranians or Muslims or Shia or Sunni or Wahhabi or whoever, but still keeping the western countries as blame free. It is disrespectful to the innocent people who died in Paris, in Beirut, in Syria, in Iraq and everywhere in the world. What happens in this world today is everybody's responsibility and the solution lies within the big powers in this world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Awol said:

Schengen is already in tatters, this might be the thing that kills it completely. Once free movement goes it's all downhill from there. 

I think that's something we all ought to be worried about.

A few terrorists killing (a few hundreds of) people in Western Europe is not going to bring an end to Europe as we know it.

A Europe with countries 'retaking control of their borders definitively' (Marine Le Pen) and reinforcing that control by walls, fences and the use of force is much more likely to succeed there.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Awol said:

Frank Gardner the BBC security correspondent reporting UK officials as stating this was a self contained cell of graduates from Syria.

If correct that's the awful and entirely obvious outcome so many predicted would happen. I got shouted down for saying this before but anyone who goes over there to fight with Jihadis should never come back. 

what about their human rights ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said when the refugee crisis first started but I'll say again, men of fighting age that are from the middle east should not be allowed into Europe, they should be immediately deported back. Women, children and the elderly, fine, but men of fighting age proves to be too much of a risk. As we have found out last night, and will doubtless see again in the future.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Awol said:

 I got shouted down for saying this before but anyone who goes over there to fight with Jihadis should never come back. 

Were you shouted down for saying they should never come back or was your opinion questioned because you suggested that anyone going (to join IS - though I guess possibly anyone else) should be the object of extrajudicial execution?

Was your opinion questioned (not shouted down) because you were, explicitly, saying that there should be no trial of anyone once ID'd?

Was your opinion questioned (not shouted down) because, at the heart of it, was the foregoing of any kind of due process or recognition for international law (perhaps with prescience - see the new Ministerial Code)?

Edited by snowychap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The_Rev said:

"Sorry kids, Daddy can't come with us to our new life in Europe. Just in case he scares the locals."

see your point definitely but it works both ways "your dad got killed by a refugee in the name of allah" majority of refugees are not going to commit violence but some will and lives will be lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda agree with that. The current cyclic process of bombing their homeland gives them the justification in their minds to do these things... and then we react by more bombing them some more.

We need to break that somehow.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do these terrorists always seem to carry their passports around with them

The majority of them were all carrying theirs apparently one of them came over to greece from syria with the flow of refugees last october

 

Edited by AshVilla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AshVilla said:

Why do these terrorists always seem to carry their passports around with them

The majority of them were all carrying theirs apparently one of them came over to greece from syria with the flow of refugees last october

 

i read on reddit that police can detain you if you dont have a valid i.d on you or something in france. So i imagine you do whatever you can to make sure something doesnt stop you from going to paradiise. (if car got pulled over or something)

Edited by gharperr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â