AntrimBlack Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 3 hours ago, jon_c said: If we think for one second we'll get £6m, then good. If not , what the hell are we playing at? They know they will not get £6m for him, it is a bargaining position. What would you have done - start at £1m? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingman Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 If we get £6m for Sinclair then i will show my arse in Burtons window! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post HanoiVillan Posted June 26, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted June 26, 2016 On 6/24/2016 at 23:06, krisagg75 said: i'd keep him if only for his girlfriends norks I've been considering this post for a while. I thought to myself, why would it be worth keeping Sinclair at the club purely for his partner's norks, when presumably your only access to said norks comes from late-night, one-handed Google Image searches, and those could clearly be performed in the same way if Scott **** Sinclair were playing his football in Glasgow, allowing us to get rid of an absolute waste of space from the squad list and wage bill. But now I've thought to myself, maybe there's more to it than this. Maybe @krisagg75 is a dirty dog who gets invited over to Chez Sinclair to fondle the norks while Sinclair and Gabby film it on their cameraphones, and Grealish lies drunk on the sofa. Tell me you can't see it. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 4 hours ago, HanoiVillan said: I've been considering this post for a while. I thought to myself, why would it be worth keeping Sinclair at the club purely for his partner's norks, when presumably your only access to said norks comes from late-night, one-handed Google Image searches, and those could clearly be performed in the same way if Scott **** Sinclair were playing his football in Glasgow, allowing us to get rid of an absolute waste of space from the squad list and wage bill. But now I've thought to myself, maybe there's more to it than this. Maybe @krisagg75 is a dirty dog who gets invited over to Chez Sinclair to fondle the norks while Sinclair and Gabby film it on their cameraphones, and Grealish lies drunk on the sofa. Tell me you can't see it. ...can see it. Scott Sinclair hiding in the wardrobe. Just likes be hides every week on the pitch. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 So easy to picture! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted June 26, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted June 26, 2016 16 minutes ago, HanoiVillan said: So easy to picture! Yep, just put her name into Google and the norks are everywhere. So easy to picture it's untrue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hornso Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 On 6/25/2016 at 08:21, Zatman said: he got 6 goals last season and 5 of them came in one week vs Notts County and a woeful Sunderland team Exactly 6 goals in 33 appearances last season and 3 of them were penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 9 hours ago, Hornso said: Exactly 6 goals in 33 appearances last season and 3 of them were penalties. and one of those penalties was flapped in by Roy Carroll. So really, it's only 5 goals! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMAICAN-VILLAN Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 15 minutes ago, rodders0223 said: and one of those penalties was flapped in by Roy Carroll. So really, it's only 5 goals! If any hit the crossbar you can write those off too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raymond Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 1 minute ago, JAMAICAN-VILLAN said: If any hit the crossbar you can write those off too. He basically scored -3 goals TBH. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 You still there Brendan? Mr Rodgers? Hello? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 2nd bid from Celtic rejected he must be in RDMs plans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daweii Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 3 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: 2nd bid from Celtic rejected he must be in RDMs plans That or the bid is criminally low. Yes Celtic aren't getting a huge boost from TV money, but the new TV money has inflated the going price of players with Premier League experience even if they are shit like Sinclair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Pangloss Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 (edited) £2m is approximately 10 times more than he's worth. Edited July 10, 2016 by Dr_Pangloss 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnStortford Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 How did this guy ever play for post-oil city? Did he just get his big money move and then completely stop caring? Never seen someone getting paid so much with such little desire for the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 Just now, JohnStortford said: How did this guy ever play for post-oil city? Did he just get his big money move and then completely stop caring? Never seen someone getting paid so much with such little desire for the game he had the advantage of an English passport Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 Celtic probably wont be able to afford a bigger fee and his wages. thats why we should accept as low as possible to make sure he actually goes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_Mike Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 Last season the whole team was a disaster and none of them worth anything of value. But that was then and this is now. It is more than possible Sinclair could score 10 - 12 goals even as a bit player or someone to bring off the bench. Why give that away if we don't have to? and BTW I happen to think we don't need him if Ayew, Gabby, Libor remain but it is knowing who stays and who goes.... for now he should be valued like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godders Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 15 minutes ago, Zatman said: Celtic probably wont be able to afford a bigger fee and his wages. thats why we should accept as low as possible to make sure he actually goes Do we know how much the bids were for then?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 2m was the first so I'd imagine maybe 4m? I'd Accept at 7m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts