Jump to content

All New Funny Pics Thread - Clean Edition


Xann

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, mjmooney said:

Look, I have nothing against Roger Moore as a bloke, lovely chap, but he will always be THE SAINT to me. And as for him being closest to Fleming's Bond, that is so far wide of the mark I don't know where to begin. The Bond in the books may have been suave and sophisticated, but he was also hard-bitten, cynical and somewhat emotionally crippled. A hard-drinking, gambling-addicted ex-navy thug in a tuxedo, with a streak of sadism. Moore was way too soft a character, too nice, too amusingly ironic. Craig got the closest to it in Casino Royale (although I so wish it had been set in the 1950s). 

I would argue that Dalton played him best. I know thats not a popular opinion but he got closest to the darkness and grittiness of Bond from the novels for me. Sadly I think he was hamstrung by some poor movies overall. When his 2 movies were made the AIDS crisis was at its height so the decision was made to tone down his womanizing. (I think Bond only had one partner in the 1st Dalton movie.) The movies were also made when Arnie and Stallone were duking out with big blockbuster explosion-fests. The Bond team tried to follow this trend in a similar way that they followed Bourne with Craig's style. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen any of the Dalton films so I couldn't comment. I'm a Connery fan, and the Moore films basically ruined the franchise for me, until Craig rescued it (for a little while, anyway). 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Xann said:

There's a gender swap pic of the UK cabinet.

Temporary blindness prevented a link.

They do say that too much of *that* will make you go blind. 

Pictures of Michael Gove with long hair are an odd choice of inspiration though. 

Edited by ml1dch
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Genie said:

Hawk eye cocked up, yeah ok. However,

Linesman also missed it

Referee also missed it

VAR also missed it.

Appalling officiating.

I don't want to go all on topic on these fine boards.  But something similar cropped up on "You are the ref" a couple of years ago when they were still being done on the graniaud.  Keith Hackett explained in the notes that the correct procedure was to defer to the technology in terms of awarding/not awarding the goal rather than relying on what the officials may/may not have seen. 

AFAIK once the ref had stopped play for an infringement (or more accurately I imagine, once the free kick had been taken, so possibly the referee should not have allowed play to continue) VAR would not be able to intervene owing to a new passage of play starting.

#LawsNerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â