Jump to content

January Transfer Speculation 2015


Recommended Posts

I do not rate Weimann.  He is meant to be the best finisher in the club, if true we are doomed.

 

I always remember when Dean Saunders wasnt scoring but fans claimed he worked hard a guy said he would run around trying hard till his balls were blue and cost a fraction that Saunders cost but what we needed was goals.  I think this applies to Weimann as well.

 

As for Gabby he hasnt moved on or developed his game since ONeil left.  It is like he is pining for the old days and ways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not rate Weimann.  He is meant to be the best finisher in the club, if true we are doomed.

 

I always remember when Dean Saunders wasnt scoring but fans claimed he worked hard a guy said he would run around trying hard till his balls were blue and cost a fraction that Saunders cost but what we needed was goals.  I think this applies to Weimann as well.

 

As for Gabby he hasnt moved on or developed his game since ONeil left.  It is like he is pining for the old days and ways.

 

Weimann may well be the best finisher at the club but its hard to tell either way when he is played out wide. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Weimann is a decent finisher but lacks composure at times, remember that chance against spurs when we were 1-0 up, ball comes to him, 10 yards out, large section of the goal to aim at and he time to take a touch, instead he hit it first time and it went high and wide, turned from a 2-0 win to a 1-2 defeat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not rate Weimann. He is meant to be the best finisher in the club, if true we are doomed.

I always remember when Dean Saunders wasnt scoring but fans claimed he worked hard a guy said he would run around trying hard till his balls were blue and cost a fraction that Saunders cost but what we needed was goals. I think this applies to Weimann as well.

As for Gabby he hasnt moved on or developed his game since ONeil left. It is like he is pining for the old days and ways.

I don't understand the Saunders anecdote. It's troubling me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dodged a bullet if true IMO, although it wouldn't surprise me if it was resurrected late in the window. I'd take Sinclair on loan so he can prove himself, but a full transfer is a massive gamble - perhaps not at £2.5m but certainly at £4m given the embarrassing size of the kitty that Lerner has sanctioned. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dodged a bullet if true IMO, although it wouldn't surprise me if it was resurrected late in the window. I'd take Sinclair on loan so he can prove himself, but a full transfer is a massive gamble - perhaps not at £2.5m but certainly at £4m given the embarrassing size of the kitty that Lerner has sanctioned.

The fee is irrelevant, at least at that kind of level. It's the wages that would trouble me. I wouldn't want him on £50k a week for 5 years at this point.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not fussed about Sinclair only played well at Swansea 2 or so years ago now.I would suspect he wanted a decent wage too and right of the club to not get themselves stuck with high paid player who doesnt warrent it.

Also City with FPP need to get cash in now seems wanted a decent fee for a player who has quite literally for one reason ot another done nothing since he moved there.

Be interesting to see what out other options are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of use Terms of Use, Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Â