Villan4Life Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2657391/Robert-Snodgrass-wanted-Aston-Villa-QPR-Hull-West-Ham-Norwichs-6m-valuation-prove-restrictive.html Aston Villa, QPR, Hull and West Ham are keen on Robert Snodgrass but Norwich want £6million. The 26-year-old has a year left on contract but Norwich do not want to lose the Scotland international - hence the valuation. Short article above but Mail linked us with Snodgrass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 1) He's at Norwich. 2) We're not paying money for players. This is nonsense. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 £6 million lol. Wont be paying that. Also wont be picking us over the wages QPR will offer him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_Mike Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 It has to be nonsense I agree, We let Alrighton go I assume because we already have N'zog, Tonev and now Grealish, Plus Gabby gets thrown out wide, We might need but can't afford to waste whatever money we do have to spend in trasnfer fees on a 4th. It is a gamble but we gotta hope that 1 out of those 3 has a great year. Hopefully 1 plus Grealish making wonderful off the bench appearances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Pangloss Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 Decent player with a good left foot, but is pretty slow. £6m seems a bit steep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briny_ear Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 We're not paying transfer fees. The Norwich chairman would rather stick pins in his eyes than sell to Lambert/Villa. These are both facts easily identifiable by any journalist. So they come up with a story that we're keen on Robert Snodgrass. Fantastic. Well done the sleuths of the Daily Mail 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulC Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 Good player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 Not for £6m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Cropley Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 It has to be nonsense I agree, We let Alrighton go I assume because we already have N'zog, Tonev and now Grealish, Plus Gabby gets thrown out wide, We might need but can't afford to waste whatever money we do have to spend in trasnfer fees on a 4th. It is a gamble but we gotta hope that 1 out of those 3 has a great year. Hopefully 1 plus Grealish making wonderful off the bench appearances.[/quote I just wish people would understand that we let Albrighton go because he wasn't that great......nice guy I'm sure, but regular Premiership performer ? I fear not......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 We could get a good few defenders in for that much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugeley Villa Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I like him and I'd like to see him at the villa. I think 6m is the going rate these days for a player like snodgrass. One signing I'd be happy with.We let albrighton go because he was shit, simple as. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 If we were to get somebody from Norwich it would probably be more likely Pilkington who I think is available on a free transfer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theboyangel Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Certainly not happening with that price tag!!! I agree with the Pilkington shouts - a slightly more versatile and quicker player but most importantly a free transfer!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandaq Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I like both of them to be honest. Snodgrass is a pretty good set piece taker from what I have seen but considering he is on a free Pilkington is something we really should go for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Hmmm, snodgrass played under lambert at Livingston and Norwich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshVillain Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 pish. Can't see this happening due to takeover status + if we get new ownership I sincerely hope they have higher ambitions than Snodgrass. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Good player. On a highlight reel he is. About £4.5m too much, doesn't impact games nearly enough. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulver Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Good God no. As average as average gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IwishIwasalivein1982 Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Lambert trying to sign Norwich players. Haven't heard that one before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Off to Hull for around £4m, Lescott too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts