Jonoridge91 Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Just noticed he's edited out the original post to this thread. Hmmm. Yeah and deleted all his previous posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briny_ear Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Seems strange. If they were hoping to hide the news about a broken leg, they need a lesson in physiology, as well as how to run a football club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troon_villan Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Yeah I mean, where's the actual harm in what he said about kozak?? So we found out a few hours early?Look, if anything he was putting a positive spin on the club affairs by starting this thread. Bizarre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciggiesnbeer Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Seems strange. If they were hoping to hide the news about a broken leg, they need a lesson in physiology, as well as how to run a football club. Agreed. Did they really think Sheffield was going to change their tactics based on whether Kozak was injured or not? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSV Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 wish we could send an email to shut PF down that easily. Having an ITK was great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciggiesnbeer Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 (edited) I think part of what he(?) did was just lay out information that Lambert would happily volunteer if any of the lame arse journos who get to speak with him every week actually asked. For example would it be that hard for some journliast to ask about why we played our corners a certain way as HH answered easily and clearly? Or asking specifically if he agreed that we needed a certain kind of midfielder? How is that harmful? If the club wants to learn anything positive from HairyHands it is that we actually give a damn about the details of the game and are interested. It was foolish of him/her to leak lineups before games but aside from that I cant think of anything he said that Lambert/PF couldn't easily and clearly lay out publicly. Edited January 4, 2014 by ciggiesnbeer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Anyone notice Gardner was on bench against Swansea then nowhere to be seen two days later at Sunderland? Anyone notice we won against Sunderland the same day the new series of Sherlock started? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Seems strange. If they were hoping to hide the news about a broken leg, they need a lesson in physiology, as well as how to run a football club. I find it all very odd too. Bearing in mind that apparently the club have known about HH for a while, him leaking team selections days in advance is fine but leaking an injury a few hours early is a big no-no?! Bizarre really. I can't even begin to fathom how this club operates nowadays, I really can't... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TB Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 Could it possibly be that leaking the news of the injury pinpointed his identity, due to a very limited number of people aware of the severity of the injury at the time of posting? Whereas the knowledge of the probable team selection could be more wide-spread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blandy Posted January 4, 2014 Moderator Share Posted January 4, 2014 Topic locked as it's morphed into one about the poster, not the original subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts