mockingbird_franklin

Just imagine this conversation, so Mr XXXX how did you wind up voting conservative, well i blame UKIP, i didn't realise at the time how it was just a gateway party, I thought 'Where could be the harm to just trying voting for it once' and I would be OK, I told myself I'd remain in control, I don't know how It happened,but my voting for words removed is something i just instantly do when they mention cutting immigration or taking back control, I know the consequences will probably be bad for me and people like me, but I just can't seem to concentrate or see the nasty effects.I'll unleash.

just checked the date, wasn't sure if i'd inadvertantly stepped through a time vortex and appeared in 2010 or 2015, wonder if people will swallow this crap like they did last times they wheeled it out ?

complaincency that the tame media will spin it for them possibly?

The Tory party have been hinting at compulsory insurance for many things for quite a while, it's worth researching umin insurance and the part it has played in the destruction of the benefits system, But never mind insurance companies are cuddly teddy bears who only have your best interests at heart,

well like so many Tory party policies, it proposes to do one thing on the surface and does something completely at odds (and it's usually nasty) with the headline propaganda in reality they do it too consistently to be coincidence, never been a coincidence theorist.

so a lead of 13%, pretty huge and difficult to overcome, can anyone remind me what was it a couple of weeks ago?

of course you wouldn't or actually couldn't, we usually vote on Thursdays and never on a Sunday.

Well it wouldn't be a shocker if it wasn't just a sham and a way to deter people from getting justice, if it was genuinely fair and not a typical Tory smoke and mirrors con

To be fair to them, they are only repeating the total sum of official Tory party election strategy. How can you expect their supporters to have a coherent reason to vote for them, when the Tory Party doesnt have one

PIP (and ESA) sums up Tory attitude to fairness, 1) introduce new benefits to replace perfectly functioning current ones, and in doing so change the rules to make it much harder to qualify 2) mislead people about the benefit, paint a picture of people getting it as scrounging and workshy lazy spongers when PIP (and DLA which it replaced) in fact, is a non means tested benefit that people get whether in work or not and their qualification should be based on their need to meet the extra costs and burden of being disabled 3) keep changing the goalposts to prevent people who should get it from qualifying 4) set secret targets and give huge amounts of money to private firms to meet these targets for denial of benefit, give them far more to undertake these biased and unfair assessments than is saved through denial of the benefit to those that should qualify 5) introduce a mandatory second layer of dispute resolution that has an target to uphold 80% of all decisions this results in the situation were approximately 60% of all claimants going to expensive appeals have decisions overturned, often seeing a zero point zero benefit award assessment overturned to a high rate care and mobility award. effectively turning going to tribunal the real assessment of need 5) spend large amounts of money to hire lawyers to fight against these appeals. whilst making every effort of denying any help to those appealing 6) hide the truth about the effects of what your doing or just plain lie (this is also repeated at steps 1 to 5)

Another prediction to tick off the list i made in 2010, watch out for the expansion of this idea over the next Tory governed parliament, If you're not part of the 1% they will eventually come after any wealth you've accumulated

his coached hand guestures seem delayed, like he keeps remembering at the last second or just after they should be done that he is supposed to be doing them.

studies have confirmed that the BBC is neither biased to the left or right, they are biased to whoever is in government, a cynic might suggest its to do with who holds the reigns to the gravy train.

fresh from stealing ed's policy ideas, the Tory party have only gone and decided to copy his pledge stone too.

I think it could be fake though, it's far too well thought out to be a Tory manifesto

not to be outdone, the Tories have leaked their manifesto

a foot injury could have resulted in serious brain damage if it was,

conservative party political broadcast leaked

well there has never been a shortage of people willing to sell their fellow man short for a few pieces of silver or some other perceived advantage

almost as if there is an agenda that needs someone like may and the Tories in charge that the those controlling said media support, but i'm sure its just a coincidence

most history is just the story from a particular view point. and one things banks excel at is having excellent propaganda. I would say 99.9% of the population don't even know what the real business of most banks is. believing some fairly tale provided by the banks.

wouldnt be surprised if it's probably part of their strategy

I think that's an overly kind and gentle description of them

conspiracy theorists are right churning over and forming the idea that of how she is a sleeper plant in the labour party waiting to till called on to provide a means to look a weak and wobbly conservative leader look relatively genuine and competent especially at the times like that of a general election,

I can you imagine the opening negotiations , Ms robotnic, "well what we need is a strong and stable agreement that can only be provided by a strong and stable negotiator like myself who is both strong and stable, and not a coalition of chaos offered by a chaotic coalition of chaos that is the EU which would result in chaotic coalition like agreement.