Jump to content

LondonVillian

Established Member
  • Posts

    2,201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LondonVillian

  1. Just now, Davkaus said:

    None of those things are explicitly called out as justifications or requirements for a red, so the irony of you telling people to learn the rules...

    They are though , the irony of trying to correct on something you clearly don't know anything about. 

  2. 2 minutes ago, calcifer said:

    It was the speed he was going and the intent, Mcginn was going 100 for the player. At that speed red had no choice. 

    going for the man is not a red though learn the rules. 

    no studs, no over the ball, not from behind. 

    Meets 0 criteria for a red. 

    • Like 1
  3. 1 minute ago, Indigo said:

    Lads he's completely barrelled at Udogie and intentionally booted him with absolutely no attempt at winning the ball.😂 It's an almost dictionary definition red card, no excuses he's let the side down by totally losing his head.

    Nope zero stud contact with any part of his body. Foot not over the ball and not from behind. 

    zero definitions of a straight red card.

    tackles like that are made every game yellow at most. 

    laughable to say otherwise

×
×
  • Create New...
Â