Jump to content

ThunderPower_14

Established Member
  • Posts

    3,115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ThunderPower_14

  1. This is fair, but part of that was forced by the end of terracing after Hillsborough. I'd guess the price of a stand has increased a bit since the 90s, even relatively. Ellis also famously missed the opportunity to invest in the squad during the vital formative years of the Premier League, and we got left behind. Perhaps NSWE don't want to miss our chance.
  2. Clearly the money doesn't line up though. If it was as simple as build a bigger stand and have more money, Ellis would have done it. Every single major stadium work anywhere involves significant public funding. The only one I can think of that didn't was Metlife stadium in New Jersey in 2010, but that was shared between two teams.
  3. I understand being limited in buying players, but it doesn't sit right with me at all that we may be forced to sell key players to avoid breaching FFP. Especially when we're in a league with the likes of Man City who have intentionally flouted it to great success and will probably receive a relative slap on the wrist.
  4. What's the point of the post then? He's clearly trying to cast doubt over the lion being made for the badge.
  5. He's definitely insinuating that the 2015 lion could have been stolen from Shutterstock, which is insane and absolutely misinformation that appears designed to discredit the club. He's not saying it definitively was stolen, but that's misinformation in the modern world isn't it. Insinuate without flat out making a direct claim so you can stir up unrest but back away from what you've said when it's challenged. The Jordan Peterson method.
  6. I guess you're advocating for the thoroughly underwhelming current round badge again?
  7. If this is correct it fixes the biggest issues with the badge for me. No more yellow on blue. No more drop shadow. Added claret for a better colour balance. The lion retains its outline for smaller applications. Yellow and claret lion digital application looks spectacular. Gold lion physical application looks spectacular. I'd convinced myself that we were going to have a shit badge. If we end up with this it'll be the best badge we've had in 30 years, arguably ever.
  8. Sure, but how much revenue are we talking here, given the outlay and the 2 seasons without a stand? How long does it take to pay for itself? There's a reason the big US sports teams hold their cities to ransom and threaten to move if the city doesn't contribute to stadium work. It's basically never a great financial move to build a stadium. They're almost always built with public money playing a big part. We'll eventually have to rebuild the stand but the financial realities will always exist. It's easy for me to say when i'm 16000km away and don't have to deal with the stand I guess.
  9. Chelsea spent 20 years as one of the biggest clubs in the world with a 40,000 seat stadium. They're still playing in a 40,000 seat stadium. A delay of a few seasons won't kill us.
  10. Heck's badge has enormous issues. But what you're complaining about has been a problem for 15 years. Has anyone gotten confused and forgotten we wear claret in that time? Have we had a single identity issue because of the badge colours? I absolutely get the preference for claret and blue and that's fine, but my problem with gold on blue is about contrast, not identity. I think the lion rampant in our style screams Aston Villa even without the colours at this point.
  11. It's not ideal but we've clearly decided that how it looks on the shirt is paramount, and we want the badge to stand out on the shirt, as opposed to West Ham who have decided to have their badge blend in. I personally think our badge There's pros and cons for either method, and I think you'll find that badges all over the football world don't necessarily match up with the club's main colours. Some would argue that it's a very good thing that our primary focus is how the badge sits on the shirt as opposed to how it looks elsewhere. Even then, in every single social media application it'll sit on a claret background to give that colour balance. I'm not defending flat yellow on blue if that's what we get, especially if they display it with that awful drop shadow, but the badge having fairly minimal claret isn't the end of the world provided we make sure it's sitting on claret the vast majority of the time.
  12. It's really not hard to represent the 3d texture in flat, digital applications. I'm not sure why they wouldn't do it. If they give the lion some contrast it completely changes the badge and erases one of its biggest issues. Not all of it's issues, but the biggest one. If we have a good digital version of the 3d lion and we primarily use that lion without the surrounding badge, we might just look good after all.
  13. If we just go the lion on the shirt, and go for a textured, relief lion like that leak, it's an absolute best case scenario given the new badge. Fingers crossed!
  14. Re the elite/standard/whatever level of our deal with Adidas, I just can't see that it would be lucrative enough if we had the same "standard" sort of deal that the likes of Leeds or Fulham have. If that's what Adidas offered us I'm certain we'd have kept looking. Really excited about this, I think we'll get something spectacular.
  15. I don't think the lack of clarity from the club is good for us, it tells me they're hoping the angst will die down by the time the unveiling happens. I'm guessing they knew going back to the old yellow lion on blue would be wildly unpopular so they leaked it early to allow people to get angry before the official unveiling in the hope that we'll settle down and the public backlash won't be so strong.
  16. I have a 2016 Adidas Germany away shirt from the world cup, just because I liked the design, and it's by far the most comfortable replica shirt i've ever owned and it's still in great condition 7.5 years later. I'm fully on board with Adidas. Happy with Nike or Puma as well if it's one of those, which it sounds like it must be.
  17. Agree fully with this. We started it back with the Lerner badge and we've been stuck with "design by committee" level badges ever since. Fans theoretically want the full club name, they theoretically want it to be round, they theoretically want it to have the star, they theoretically want it to have 1874. But none of the fans voting are picturing the same badge when voting, and what you end up with is a Homer car where the designer is forced to shoehorn in too much for fear of going against survey results. The fans should be surveyed on feeling, not elements. What do we want the badge to say about us. It's then the designer's job to capture that. Fan consultation should be to provide a broad brief and the final sign off, and nothing in between. Of course, don't change the badge at all if you're not going to do it properly. We should just keep using the Lerner badge if we're going to make some window dressing changes. Its not ideal but at least there's some familiarity. Then do a proper rebrand when you're willing to fund it.
  18. You'd have to assume there are some pretty significant crisis meetings going on at the club at the moment. It's basically a Leeds badge reaction again, and they're getting rightly slammed for the process as well as the result. Heck putting a stop to the round badge talked about "not being happy with it's impact" and gave the strong impression that a much more comprehensive and well thought out rebrand. To end up with the badge we're about to get is a worst case scenario, it's a downgrade on last season's badge. Surely this isn't "having the impact" Heck wants?
  19. The West Ham shirt is basically exactly this. I think it's generally fine, doesn't look weird etc.
  20. A supporters group existing and being given the opportunity to consult absolutely does not mean they're in step with the majority of the supporters. Given the nature and scope of these sorts of bodies, it is frighteningly easy to have a small group of individuals gain and maintain power and use the supporters trust to further causes important to them and not necessarily the wider supporter base because they think they know better. I don't know enough about the Villa Trust to make a specific comment, but there are so many of these supporter groups who don't achieve a lot. Given the badge that's about to officially release, it certainly doesn't feel like we're having a say either way at the moment.
  21. My anger is building over the money saving argument. Save money elsewhere and get the branding right. Clubs with far smaller resources than us have managed very successful rebrands. Look at Bristol City, Brentford and Crystal Palace.
  22. A drop shadow is not better. It doesn't fix the lack of readability. It just adds a baby's first logo design element to our badge that shouldn't be there. 1874 shouldn't be there either. Or make it prominent. But if it's barely visible, what's it actually achieving? It's just clutter.
  23. I'm not sure how it vastly improves on it. At best it's a break even. It's better to have the full club name on it, but a drop shadow and the 1874 in white on a sky blue base? Amateur hour. The Lerner badge has some obvious design problems but it's cleaner than the new badge, which has the same design problems plus a couple of new ones.
  24. I don't get how an evolution of the Lerner badge is any less expensive than an entirely new badge. You still have to replace it everywhere. I guess maybe you don't have to in places where it's just the lion? Just do it properly ffs. Spend the money. Cheaping out on a rebrand is something you'd expect from a non-league club. If we want to be a massive global club we need to act like one and branding is integral to that.
  25. He'd be absolutely perfect in the Ramsay role and he'd be our best player. Every player around him would benefit.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â