Jump to content

cyrusr

VT Supporter
  • Posts

    2,629
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cyrusr

  1. Describing Black Sabbath as Ozzy Osborne’s band. He was there for the first 8 albums and the last one. They have done more albums without him. It’s Iommi’s & Geezer’s band if anyones and they were the ones who created the guitar sound; Ozzy simply bought a microphone. He didn’t even write the lyrics. F*** off.
  2. Team scored 34 Points Benched scored 38 points Only position I picked the best choice in was GK... thought I would be smart to not have Haaland in and so could have better options elsewhere. Now will have to take a points deduction and take out Darwin or Jesus to fit him him (Mitrovic is staying in at 6.5m!). I hate this game.
  3. Along with Ward-Prowse this is now up to 29 points. Only Sanchez (GK) left to play. My actual team? Currently on 25 points.
  4. Having set up the squad totally forgot to set up the team for this week Currently have 17 points on my bench with Zinchenko and Mitrovic and 5 points in my actual team…
  5. cyrusr

    U.S. Politics

    Not 100% sure but in the clip the prosecution highlighted that they told his lawyers and asked if it was privileged. Doesn’t appear to be respond at all by the lawyers but they may have been waiting for instructions from him.
  6. I was just explaining the case to the wife and she asked who was funding it. I am unsurprised by this to be honest. These cases are always a nightmare and all this is doing is making everyone suffer more.
  7. This is literally the only logical reason. They know backing Sunam will mean that they are unlikely to get cabinet position. However, with nearly half the MPs backing him, it would seem quite likely there will be a fair number of rebellions…
  8. Legal fees for Court costs are a lot. If it does go to Court you are likely to look at £500 - £1000 just to attend direction hearings. If it does go to a contested final hearing you could easily looking £1000 - £2000 per day. Always negotiable but run the risk of using someone less experienced and/or not as good but it is not always "you get what you pay for either".
  9. https://www.gov.uk/check-legal-aid Short answer is though for private law unless there are allegations of domestic abuse/child abuse then you will not be eligible. If there is (don't go into detail now) then you might be subject to finances. I cannot recall specifically the threshold but more or less unless you are on benefits and/or on pretty much minimum wage you are unlikely to eligible either. If you are having difficulties then the ultimate action would be to seek a Child Arrangements Order (spend time with) but in order to make any of those applications then you will need to attempt mediation first (think should be accessible through the same link). £199 is a lot to be honest; it depends what they are going to do with that. Honestly call around a few firms and get quotes. This is by far the best place to go https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/. I would suggest someone who is either Family Law Accredited or on the Children Panel. I suspect for an initial appointment you will be looking between £50 + VAT to £200 + VAT. Depends on who you go see. Just as a gut reaction, subject to speaking with your ex, it sounds like it may be more a communication issue in which case Mediation might resolve it https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/find-local-mediator/. Hope that helps
  10. I don’t think he will. He’s been PM now and can get better paid jobs elsewhere. I think literally the only thing that would draw him back would be sheer pride, which is possible I agree. However, he can act all high and mighty from the sides and make a killing. If he isn’t booted out as an MP beforehand I suspect he won’t stand at the next general election.
  11. The more trash/mudslinging/nonsense spouted by Truss and Sunak the better. The lower the Tories can go the harder it will be for them to recover.
  12. I am weirded out that not only do I know a song that @Xann has posted but it is also a great song...
  13. Ah that makes sense - vengeance by Johnson makes a lot of sense. It would be nice to have a government that actually runs the country instead of playing oneupmanship with its own party.
  14. the "Vote of Confidence" is utterly bizarre to be honest. Unnecessary and a complete waste of time. It actually allowed the opposition to air their views formally and has seemingly forced another MP losing the whip. The Tories seem to be intent on self-flagellation at the moment don't they?
  15. Yeah but don't forget the Tory party MPs and party members are much more intelligent that the rest of the plebs so they can understand other voting methods rather than FPTP. Plebs though should stick to FPTP and not worry their tiny brains about it.
  16. Also, why is the recording so shoddy again? watching on the YouTube recording and again jumpy as anything.
  17. Just sticking on the 2nd one to see how badly they rip each other apart. Shame there won't be a round 3.
  18. So what’s the code when a customer drops a deuce in the aisle?
  19. cyrusr

    U.S. Politics

    Always loved doing this. I've actually gone further left than the last time I did it but have always been in that quadrant. I was an "Outsider Left" for the US quiz one
  20. Why are there not 1 but 3 television debates between this lot?! 1 I can understand as although we aren’t voting, there will be some curiosity given this person will be PM but why do we need a debate tonight, Sunday and Monday? Just hoping for as much mud slinging as possible.
  21. On your last point I do suspect that it will be not very “canon-esq” but hopefully they don’t completely screw it over. I definitely got the vibes of “Galadriel Warrior Princess” though.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â