Jump to content

nobbysmate

Full Member
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Na ever since he got pissed and beat up women :evil: what's wrong with that? they should make it into an olympic sport i reckon!
  2. oops, the formation got a bit scewiffed when i quoted it there!
  3. i'd go with that, except have berger instead of davis. the 2 full-backs are more than capable of getting forward a bit and helping the midfield.....plus that gets rid of samuel. i wouldn't be surprised at all if o'leary tried this 1 out
  4. we'd never get bridge on loan. mourinho needs him as cover for left back.
  5. you don't SERIOUSLY think laursen's fit do u drat? he said himself only a few days ago that it's still not right!
  6. yep, we shouldn't be playing laursen unless we have to i reckon (by that i mean as a 3rd choice centre back), as fielding a blatantly unfit centre back in the prem is just no good
  7. i reckon we'll get an injury to either jpa or phillips early on, lukey moore will get his chance and do the buisness!.........in my little fantasy anyway
  8. so why don't u post that on a valencia message board???
  9. malbranque is the creative midfielder we require. the mere fact that we're arguing about what part of midfield he actually plays in shows his versatility. the fact is, he does pretty much cover the centre and right of midfield and has the skill and creativity that we so need and miss. imagine our right half of midfield with him and solano!!!!! GET HIM!!!!!!!!!!
  10. steed malbranque............thoughts anyone???? personally i'd love to see him in claret n blue, an ideal signing in my eyes!!
×
×
  • Create New...
Â