Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 30/10/14 in all areas

  1. Anyone got a load of spare time on their hands and want to do something productive? Saw this the other day and think it could solve all our problems on Sunday.. Who wants to help me set it up before the game?
    5 points
  2. Lambert spent more than enough money in the preceding windows to have bought either player. He's been at the club a while now, and still not signed that number 10, so it can't be that much of a priority. In that time he's spent, give or take, 17m on players that are now not at the club any more, yet still no number 10. He's signed multiple left backs, a selection of central midfielders who all do the same thing, and still no number 10 If Lambert really wanted one, we'd have one. There's, cumulatively, been enough money there, and he's opted to use it elsewhere
    5 points
  3. I think i've mentioned this before, but a few years ago I was watching a movie at the Showcase in Dudley and this utter word removed and his missus hadn't stopped talking (loud, not whispering) since they had sat down. About twenty minutes in, i'd had enough and made like I was getting up to go to the loo but instead just stood up and stayed where I was. Sure enough, after 10 seconds or so Mr.Chatty Bollox says 'can you sit down?' to which I turned and replied 'yeah of course mate, as soon as you shut the **** up'. After a brief grumble to his missus he shut up and I sat back down. Job done.
    5 points
  4. 5 points
  5. FWIW, this is an excellent post and one which I (an apparent "Lambert supporter") completely agree with. The test was always this season. I've been saying for ages that, for me, he's got until this Christmas. He's had financial restrictions etc. etc. but this is now a squad that has been developed over 2 seasons - the crap (for the most part) has been rid of. We should be seeing at least some improvement, but we're currently not. I'm actually not fussed about losing 5 games in a row given the teams we've played, but the manner of the defeats have been poor. Similarly, in beating Stoke, we didn't play that well - just shut them out. Hull and Liverpool were good performances and the ball retention against Q.P.R. was good too. Outside of that, not much cheer. Lambert has been unlucky with injures, of course. We're a side that is massively reliant on Benteke and, whilst this is partly down to transfers etc., I don't particularly blame Lambert for that. However, the team should still be performing, with the ball, better than it has been. I don't want Lambert sacked right now and I'd like him to succeed at the club as he seems to be a pretty humble guy with the interests of the club at heart (which seems quite rare these days). Time is running out though. There simply has to be an improvement this season and it needs to start now. Edit: Although you do say "vastly improved", which is a bit of a stretch I think
    4 points
  6. The argument that we are three points off 8th is just laughable. A few days ago we were only three points off 4th. Presumably in a few weeks we will only be three points off safety. We all need to be realistic and recognise that Lambert is out of his depth. We have a half decent squad which is more than capable of keeping us in the PL given proper organisation and management. All the empirical evidence shows that Lambert does not have the right skills. This needs to change as soon as possible. The utter failure to have any Plan B let alone a Plan A. The look of confusion on his face whenever the camera pans onto him. The shambolic incomprehensible post match interviews and by that I am not talking about his accent but his comments which evidence a complete disconnect with actual events. The failure to accept responsibility for the teams performance and the lack of recognition of any of the issues we face. The comment, post QPR, that Beneteke is 6-7 games of being fully fit totally missed the appalling overall team performance. It was all down to Beneteke apparently??? Spurs will batter us on Sunday as I just cannot see us either scoring a goal nor defending effectively for 90 minutes. Mark my words the fans will turn on Sunday and it will be ugly whatever the brave words on this forum. I hope if we lose the fans really do turn on Lambert as the club needs to understand that he is leading us to disaster. We need a change and we need it now. No amount of brave words on this forum can convince me otherwise.
    4 points
  7. Things Ashley Westwood is good at: - Reading the game: seeing the opposition players, knowing where his teammates are to lay off a pass, thinking two or three moves ahead. We have almost no one else on our team who can do this. - Passing and ball retention. - First touch. - He is among the most comfortable on the ball in our current team. By that I mean he does not panic in possession. - Through balls. Things Ashley Westwood can improve at: - Tackling and general defending/ball-winning. - Set piece delivery (I'm seeing improvement here, hope it continues) - Taking more risks - Taking shots. We do not have enough goals from midfield in this team. - Pressing the opponent. Things Ashley Westwood will probably never be good at: - Dribbling - "Enforcer" role - while I think he can improve on his defensive play, he is not going to evolve into a Roy Keane style DM. - Pace - Unlocking a defense My feeling is that if we aspire to be a team that controls possession, we need a player like Westwood in the team. I think he's one of our more intelligent players, but I also think we don't really play to his strengths, since we rarely seem to attempt to control possession, and there are expectations on him to do the things he's not suited to. I think it's hard for fans to see the value in a midfielder who doesn't fit either the Enforcer or Playmaker role -- he can do bits of each job but can't fill either role completely. I think he could be an important player for the team, but if we're not going to bother trying to control possession anyway, then maybe going with a midfield two of Sanchez (Enforcer) and I guess Cole ?? (Playmaker) would make more sense. Delph is a big miss, obviously (although he is also neither Enforcer nor Playmaker). Frankly I also think we miss KEA more than we know, no one in our team hassles opponents the way he did. I think Westwood is wasted in a kick-and-rush style of play. I don't know if we intentionally play that style or if our players just panic and it becomes that style. And of course as well all know, we need a creative playmaker in the center of the park, have for years. Other than Cole, who for me the jury is still out on, we have no one to fill this role. N'Zogbia and Grealish both have creativity and flair to their games but I think both are better out wide.
    4 points
  8. I don't get the feeling if he had more money, it would get better....unless it was backed by an oil field and the chances of failure are close to impossible. is Cleverley @ 8 mill any better than West wood @ 2mill ? you only have to listen to the after match interviews to know there is nothing in the tank....I'm not sure what some are waiting for.
    3 points
  9. 3 points
  10. I'd be interested to know which of our exciting megabucks signings you think Lambert isn't getting the best out of, and why. And there's also a possibility number... 3. He bought players into the club that are no better than what he already had because he is operating on a budget = we still don't know if he is a poor manager. You mean 3) he spent a very limited budget on players no better than he already had instead of improvements - poor manager No, he spent a very limited budget on players on vastly inferior wages than those they replaced, which was a policy enforced by our owner. But he's brought in better players for that inferior wage... Vlaar > Dunne Senderos > Collins (*for us, and at the moment) Okore > Cuellar Cissokho > Warnock Benteke > Heskey Lowton > Lichaj (*Lowton probably earning more) Westwood > Makoun Kozak > Delfouneso Richardson > Bannan Bacuna > Holman Cole > Carruthers Then we've had: El Ahmedi in and out Bowery in and out Luna in and out on loan Tonev in and out on loan Helenius in and out on loan Bennett in and out on loan Steer in and out on loan And loans of: Bertrand Cleverley Holt The only one who's left that we haven't improved on is Albrighton. The squad is vastly improved, for much less money (good performance there from Lambert), but he's assembled a group of better players that he's got playing worse than the ones that were in before them. Yes, he's done a great job getting cost down, BUT that doesn't excuse the fact that he's built a squad that's better than the one he inherited, but he still cannot get the best out of them. Maybe he'd be better as a scout or in a developmental role, because although he seems to be alright at spotting players for good prices it's becoming increasingly apparent he doesn't have the foggiest notion how to use them once they're signed
    3 points
  11. New and rather splendid HMHB. I’ve just seen Vengloš in Rock Ferry buying energy drinks He’s deffo taking over God knows I’ve tried to put you into verse But unfortunately When it comes to things such as this It’s all me, me, me You’re so beige I bet you think this song’s about someone else
    3 points
  12. If the opposition played without a goalkeeper, Gabby would know their was something different, but wouldnt quite work out what it was.
    3 points
  13. Does her mum have to accompany her on set? I wiki'd her. She's my age. Oh yes, I would. And if her mum is a likeness, then probably her as well. Woof. Gets her looks from her father...
    3 points
  14. 3 points
  15. - "We don't have quality players" is not valid when we fail at the basics. - "He was forced to ignore players and put them on the bomb squad" is a lie. Randy does not pick the squad. - "He is working under financial restrictions" applies to the majority of managers in the premier league. - "We have injuries" see above. - "We had a tough run of fixtures" doesn't explain abject defeats to 2 clubs struggling for points. - "They have a better squad than ours" is not always the case - but our opposition certainly play better football. - "He should get until Christmas" because somewhere between now and then he will stop doing what he has been doing for over 2 years....
    2 points
  16. I actually think Lambert has been brilliant in the transfer window, unfortunately, motivating the players, coaching them and getting them to win games is his downfall. When you consider that we could have a first team of Guzan, Cissokho, Vlaar, Senderos, Lowton, Westwood, Sanchez, Richardson, Benteke, Cole & Bacuna, costing roughly £21m, that's a pittance for a Premier League eleven. I actually believe that a better manager could get that team to finish mid-table too, so we shouldn't just dismiss Lambert's good transfers because of our current plight.
    2 points
  17. Fee agreed with United says the money was there and we were willing to use it
    2 points
  18. Date went really well. Got a 2nd date next week. Currently on 3 pulls but no shags as of yet.
    2 points
  19. FWIW, this is an excellent post and one which I (an apparent "Lambert supporter") completely agree with. The test was always this season. I've been saying for ages that, for me, he's got until this Christmas. He's had financial restrictions etc. etc. but this is now a squad that has been developed over 2 seasons - the crap (for the most part) has been rid of. We should be seeing at least some improvement, but we're currently not. I'm actually not fussed about losing 5 games in a row given the teams we've played, but the manner of the defeats have been poor. Similarly, in beating Stoke, we didn't play that well - just shut them out. Hull and Liverpool were good performances and the ball retention against Q.P.R. was good too. Outside of that, not much cheer. Lambert has been unlucky with injures, of course. We're a side that is massively reliant on Benteke and, whilst this is partly down to transfers etc., I don't particularly blame Lambert for that. However, the team should still be performing, with the ball, better than it has been. I don't want Lambert sacked right now and I'd like him to succeed at the club as he seems to be a pretty humble guy with the interests of the club at heart (which seems quite rare these days). Time is running out though. There simply has to be an improvement this season and it needs to start now. Edit: Although you do say "vastly improved", which is a bit of a stretch I think A fourth from bottom Everton and a bottom QPR! TBH I AM FUSSED about losing 5 in a row and even more FUSSED that we have failed to score in any of those games whilst letting in 13 and any Villa fan should be.
    2 points
  20. It also causes you to piss like a racehorse with incontinence issues.
    2 points
  21. It's not that they weren't good enough per se, but they were costing the club too much. Do you not remember Lambert having to essentially change the whole squad due to the wage bill? McLeish under-performed because he almost relegated a squad that was on a top 6 wage bill and finished 9th the previous season (who also under-performed, but the 2 best players from that season left).
    2 points
  22. Not really, no. Mainly because ~£58m (if we included the £8m he will blow on Cleverley in January) isn't a pittance. It is when you're trying to rebuild an entire squad almost from scratch. It's easy to just look at the numbers and come to conclusions, but even so $58M over 3 seasons (5 transfer windows so far) is nowhere near enough to be 10th-12th. The teams that are there, West Ham for example have spent half of that each window. Counting how much is spent is a bad idea, he had the constraint of not being able to offer wages to attract the vast majority of players he could afford. Which means he went for youth abroad last summer and the 2 best signings from that crop got injured for the season. He's been backed pretty well this summer, looks like he'll be after a winger in the January window too. We should see progress this season, 6 more points and 4 less losses would be good enough for me.
    2 points
  23. He's got to start changing it up after 5 games with no goal. I would rather see us go for it against Spurs than slump to another pathetic defeat. 4-2-3-1 -----------------------Guzan----------------------- Hutton-------Vlaar-------Senderos--------Cissokho --------------Sanchez-----Cleverley------------- Agbonlahor----------Grealish---------------Nzogbia --------------------------Benteke-------------------- We have to sacrifice Westwood or Cleverley for a more attacking midfielder and I don't mean Richardson. However I fully expect to see Sanchez dropped and Richardson back in. Christ Lambert depresses me
    2 points
  24. "our squad isn't that bad at all"... "Lambert's transfers haven't been too good at all". Which is it please? Should be doing better with Lambert's squad or is Lambert's squad poor? Haters gonna hate.
    2 points
  25. Not that I don't want to see him in the team, because I do. But, he's never looked "likely to do something everytime he touches the ball" for the first team. He's got huge potential but I think people are jumping the gun if they're expecting him to be ready at this stage. He might be, but I'm worried we're all expecting too much.
    2 points
  26. That's what I'm worried about, especially because I'm going on halloween. I'd pay extra for cinema tickets if it funded a big bouncer to stand at the back of each screen and punch anyone who makes unnecessary noise during films.
    2 points
  27. I'd love to see this - irrespective of Jack's game time. We're just desperately lacking in the final third/creating chances (i.e: against Q.P.R., we had so much of the ball that we should have created at least one great chance) and having two up top with one creative player behind seems a sensible shout. Sometimes bringing in a "new" player can give everyone a boost and/or a kick up the arse. Maybe Jack would provide both of these things; maybe he'd provide neither. Either way, worth a shot right now for me.
    2 points
  28. The only reason I can find for taking that negatively is if the poster has been reading too many tabloids and decided to spin it in a red top manner like "Tom Cleverley only wants to turn things around for LOYAL Villa fans, but he hates all the other ones" or some such ridiculousness. He wasn't splitting the Villa support into loyal and non-loyal, he was calling Aston Villa fans, all of them, loyal fans that the team wants to turn things around for
    2 points
  29. I'm often baffled by some of the names that are served up when people discuss managers, Sherwood? I'd rather just keep Lambert.
    2 points
  30. I quite like the blond with the glasses who doesn't speak or do much. Nice eye candy.
    2 points
  31. Sweet Jesus. If there was an open goal do you not think the variety of shots would be different??
    2 points
  32. He was on broad street watching villa play shit so it must have been a raincheck I reckon he's knuckle deep in Polski clunge now though. Thank god you didn't mix up your Ps & Fs.
    2 points
  33. Don't talk nonsense. You don't need to go that over the top to emphasise the fact that we are struggling to score goals.
    2 points
  34. "The last time that Aston Villa went five league games without scoring was March 1992. They have never failed to score in six consecutive league games." All is not lost. We have a new record to break.
    2 points
  35. Yep. He said it'd be the closest he'd get to getting off with Shakira but really he just wanted to get Pep's phone number.
    2 points
  36. Why are so many people so obsessed with pointing out stuff that show how far we've fallen? Yes, we've fallen very far. Nobody is happy about it but its the reality. Very sad. Much crying. Maybe its time to stop wallowing in self pity and get over it. Sacking the manager won't put more money in the transfer fund. I was going to write out a point by point rebuttal but reading through it seems like you've attributed every success he's ever had to blind luck. I've already done that dance, its shit. The rest is just the same nebulous, cookie cutter complaints some fans of every team in history have had. I wouldn't call his time here successful but his transfer activity has been relatively successful and he's finished within shouting distance of mid table both seasons despite having to shop in the bargain bin. I wouldn't mind if he was replaced by a new owner but the mindset of "he needs to go" in our current state without a specific, coherent plan for an alternative is what gets teams into shit. No decent manager is going to want to take a job where the fans expect a lot more than the owner is prepared to fund.
    2 points
  37. 24 Shillings and 7 Pence?One pound four and seven, as we used to say.Until the meteor hit... No, the Meteor had been phased out of RAF service by then. Mostly Lightnings, although there were still some Hunters around. Nice aeroplane, the Hunter.
    2 points
  38. 2 points
  39. For hot runny egg chat? Called it. Now engaged to a Welsh bird called Gwen. We're honeymooning in Hereford.
    2 points
  40. that's quite a specific fetish you have old man.
    2 points
  41. Finally realised who the Delph reminds me of UFC flyweight champion Demetrious 'Mighty Mouse' Johnson Uncanny
    2 points
  42. To be fair though, when has the midfield ever offered creativity in the last few years?
    2 points
  43. Chelmsley Wood is Solihull not Birmingham.
    2 points
  44. Brilliant game! After the opening scene, I spotted a captain and decided to test my luck without knowing his weaknesses and strengths. Mid-battle, ended up getting ambushed by three other captains! Died, and all captains increased in battle. Also love the way they remember you from previous battles or if you've killed them, and them having the scars to prove it. Also love that if you're on your way to a main mission, you get distracted by the side missions or just killing in general. Having a blast so far.
    2 points
  45. How a player who looks likely to do something everytime he touches the ball is not able to get into, at the very least, a matchday squad of a team who fail to create a decent goalscoring opportunity in over 300 odd minutes of football is beyond me.
    2 points
  46. That's disgusting. You're friends with a Spurs fan?
    2 points
  47. So you think that Burnley have flair players and, maybe West Ham and Crystal palace too. But, you don't think that Spurs or Southampton have any - each to their own I guess! Eh? I think you've got your backwards glasses on. He's listed our results next to their names, like you have.
    2 points
  48. Now that's a choice I would wholeheartedly disagree with. He's a clown. Plus he has too high an opinion of himself to come here.
    2 points
  49. Sorry guys.. I forgot Batman Dante..
    2 points
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of use Terms of Use, Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Â