I'm not sure why you're cherry picking a handful of examples and ignoring overall spend which is a better metric, but even so let's look at some of these. - TAA: Academy player who Klopp started playing from the age of 17. Not sure what you're getting at here. You realize when you mention players that cost nothing or very little you're making the argument in favour of Klopp right? - Robertson was a top fullback at *checks notes* Hull City and moved for a then world record fee of *turns page* £8m? That one? - Salah/Mane/Firmino: You're right, nothing needs to be said about turning a Chelsea reject slowly turning his career around in Series A, a promising young player from Hoffenheim and a good but inconsistent player from Southampton, for £30m a pop into one of the greatest front 3's in PL history. If there was something to be said I can only imagine it would be in Klopp's favour. You can go through the other 5 clubs above them in spending (maybe not City), and cherry pick way more examples of very experience signings, both good and bad. To put it in perspective, they've only spent roughly £300m more than us in the time Klopp was there. And we spent 3 of those years in the Championship! This is the same amount that Arsenal spent more than them, and yet they have been much more successful than Arsenal, and lightyears away from us. How is this possible? Is it magic?

If you're on the app don't ever close it, always stay on and just click back or refresh. That way you don't leave the queue. It will work eventually 

Got in after 90 minutes but everywhere is showing full

Nope   It's a **** shambles

Meh, pretty sure sky sports were randomly adding on about £10m to what we paid for Pau for no good reason too 

Anyone planning to move on Salah or Haaland? Maybe both? I feel like I'm going to get one of them out. VVD as well.

I think Olise will get a move before Eze, not that Eze is a bad player but Olise is younger

I played the game in my head

Interesting law changes in the MLS. Would be good if the Premier League did the same.  

Very similar vibe, but then I guess its literally a similar thing, Victorian workers terraces placed on cheap uneven land close to the jobs on the water. And all those ‘salt of the earth / he loved his mum’ scallywags. I love the urban geography of places like Liverpool. Its always the same, the shittest housing is long gone, the poor housing is still there for the workers walking to the jobs at the ends os the streets. Then, as the land and the aspect improves the houses get larger, gardens appear, ornamentation, parks, wider roads, tree lined pavements for the managers and the council staff.