');
    • limpid

      Just visiting?   27/12/16

      Please click "Sign Up" and login to use the full functionality of the site.
Sign in to follow this  
  • entry
    1
  • comment
    1
  • views
    1,626

About this blog

Studying Journalism at Uni of Derby, writing a blog to practise writing skills

Entries in this blog

skarroki

This is an ongoing blog which will look at each area of Aston Villa’s squad of players that are contracted to the club at the end of the 2016 season. The first post will go through all the Goalkeepers at the club, looking at whether the club should attempt to keep them on, or try to offload them out of the club. After a season of failure, following years of near misses, it is easy to suggest that the entire squad should be ripped up, so the aim is to look objectively at every player.

1 - Brad Guzan

The big American goalkeeper is slowly becoming part of the furniture at Villa Park, having been signed originally by Martin O’Neill. This makes him the second longest serving member of the senior squad, behind Gabriel Agbonlahor, which can be viewed in two very different ways. Having been there for so long he will understand the club, the fans, the expectations and be an old head in the dressing room that doesn’t cause trouble or grab the wrong headlines. However, unfortunately for him he has been the goalkeeper to have taken Villa through year after year of relegation battles and his form took a nosedive that he didn’t seem to quite recover from.

He is still the USA’s first choice keeper and has helped keep us up in many seasons. Under the new management, especially with the new goalkeeper coach coming in, he is worth giving another chance. If the club receive any serious bids I can see him potentially wanting to put the last season behind him with a fresh start, but he doesn’t need to be forced out the club.

31 - Mark Bunn

A strange one in the sense that he hasn’t showered himself in glory during his time at the club, but hasn’t been any worse than Guzan this season and has pulled off a couple of impressive saves. He hasn’t been a regular first choice keeper since 2009 with Sheffield United in the Championship. With his career slowly heading downward, and seemingly only ever signed permanently as a backup keeper, I would prefer it if he was moved on in the summer.

13 - Jed Steer

Jed has been at the club a fair few years now and has never made the step up from third choice keeper, which would initially ring alarm bells and suggest he’s surplus to requirements. However, this season just gone he’s been sent out on loan to Huddersfield and by all accounts has done a good job for them, to the point that they’ve extended his loan twice. A keeper who is young and still developing, Aston Villa could do a lot worse than keep him at the club, even if it was as second choice. Whether he’d want to be second choice is another question though. The chances are he has found his level and if Huddersfield are interested in keeping him permanently, I would let him go.

 

41 - Bradley Watkins

I know relatively little about this goalkeeper, but what I am aware of is that he has slowly overtaken Benjamin Seigrist in the eyes of the academy staff, who looked a capable goalkeeper himself at one time. I would guess though, at 21 years old, he probably hasn’t progressed to the level that would make him a viable bench keeper. With his contract up at the end of the month, it is unlikely that it will get renewed.

 

To summarise, I would only be looking to keep hold of Guzan for next season, but even then I wouldn’t say no to a reasonable offer. There are a lot of good goalkeepers in the lower leagues and this is one position we cannot afford to take a risk with. Rumours of Daniel Bentley are very welcome as I think he would be a fantastic option, but there are other keepers, such as David Marshall, who we could launch an ambitious bid for.

I would consider signing:

  • David Marshall - looked good for Cardiff in the Premier League, plenty of experience
  • Boaz Myhill - was at West Bromwich under Di Matteo and Clarke, looked solid when called on
  • Daniel Bentley - My preferred choice, an excellent young keeper for Southend who looks ready to take the next step. Hopefully Aston Villa can convince him to do that with them.

It would make sense to build from the back, so a solid goalkeeping signing early on in the transfer window would be a signal of intent.

Sign in to follow this  


  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Well.....Grabban was being played out of position, new to the team and all that......looked not bad to me.
    • I remember our squad at the start of the season being good enough to challenge for a top half finish if we had a positive manager. We lost Young and Downing which were huge blows but we had an emerging Albrighton and N'zogbia who lit it up with Wigan the previous season to soften the blow. The problem was, McLeish was so negative that we ended up being in serious relegation danger rather than challenging for that top half. We had a joint PL record (tied with ourselves of course) of 17 draws that season, a good chunk of those being 0-0.
    • I accept the notion that Terry is putting forward about setting up and the examples he gives.....and equally Ron Saunders built a balanced team with square pegs in square holes etc.....but in 1981 we had no injuries. Whether you and Terry blame the manager or not he does not have the balance of player to come in and cover......There is no standout cover for Jack Grealish.....there is no standout cover for Albert.....Callum and Andre are yet to make their mark, its just speculative change. You may not blame the players, but it depends what context we mean by blame.....they may be played out of position and that may be inconvenient for them, but they can still challenge and muster effort, they can still put their foot in. You cannot simply negate the players from a poor performance.....just like you cannot negate the manager. They are all in it together, except one usually carries the can for the rest. but I ask you this question? If Keinan Davis buries his square shot on goal and we win 2-1.......Or he fails to overhit his pass the Birkir and its perfectly weighted and Birkir scores, which both was quite feasible. what then?....we win 2-1.....bet that would make a whole different complexion to the game. How can the manager affect that, but the players can. Look, I don't think he got all the calls right, thats my view, but I could live with an alternative view that the players didn't do it for him either. I don't think blame sits quite right at the moment, but to suggest players are not responsible for their own performances i think is wide of the mark. Ps Ian Taylor quoted I was very disappointed with the players ( no mention of the manager) PPS Gary Neville once said when asked did you players ever blame the manager for a defeat , he said no, Never we took the responsibility for a defeat ourselves.We blamed ourselves.
    • Put him at DM or center back, no where else bruce. He kills our attacks on the right, and leaves Snodgrass way too isolated. Even Hutton gets forward more often than Axel. 
    • I suppose the argument would be to that is we still had a reasonable and experienced premier league spine. Given was seen as a good signing, it was expected Collins and Dunne could be motivated to be like 09-10, Petrov was actually having a good season before his horrible illness and Bent and Gabby were both still decent in 2011. McLeish season panned out exactly as I expected. Endless draws, negative mindset and us in the bottom half although far closer to relegation than I thought. Bigger serious for me was how long it took for protests during a game. At least it only lasted a year. The Lambert era went on and on and on and on and....I really thought it would never end and he'd still be managing us now.
    • Actually, i asked if history would be rewritten for mcleish as it was for lambert. You started going on about who did better, then said you aren't arguing who did better before once again saying you thought he did better. If you can't respond without your usual style of adding a sly dig 'definite chip' crap then perhaps refrain from joining the discussion in the first place. 
    • In some far away Internet universe WoodyTom is shouting Norwich away at you.
    • Nah it was more the debate we were having when I said you need 50 points to stay up in the championship and you actually showed that's not strictly true. You also weren't sure they needed to win half their remaining games to stay up (this was around the new year period). I'd say with just 13 games left they pretty much need to do that now, 6 wins will probably be enough. I think 47-48 points needed. SHA GD is terrible aswell so that is another thing against them.
    • You may well be right. But if they do not return, and I think Adomah is out for a long spell, the coaches will have to instil in our remaining players a way of playing that suits what we have. Otherwise, as you say it is over.