YTD: 13-19, -4.98 units (-1.64%)
Chelsea to win +200: 12 units
Chelsea DNB +125: 12 units
Catania to win +700: 5 units
Rostov to win +350: 16 units
Rostov +1 -145: risk 20 units to win 13.79
YTD: 71-102, -169.43 units (-10.63%)
PSG -2 +120: 10 units
NAC Breda to win +175: 8 units
NAC Breda DNB +110: 15 units
Espanyol +2.5 -105: risk 11 units to win 10.47
A 2-0 loss at home and a pair of clubs near us in the table beating clubs at the other end of the table. Disaster?
Our chances of staying up actually slightly improved.
16th 0.1% unchanged17th 0.6% +0.1%18th 2.4% +0.9%19th 12.3% +4.1%20th 84.6% -5.1%Villa: 99.3% (-0.1%)
Sunderland: 86.9% (+8.0%)
Swansea: 43.4% (+7.4%)
Bournemouth: 28.8% (-12.6%)
Newcastle: 24.1% (+1.2%)
Norwich: 15.2% (-3.2%)
West Brom: 1.2% (-0.3%)
Chelsea: 1.1%
YTD: 75-109, -196.45 units (-11.58%)
Panaitolikos to win -133: risk 7 units to win 5.26
NAC Breda +1 -120: risk 7 units to win 5.83
Roma to win -375: risk 9 units to win 2.40
Roma -1.5 -115: risk 8 units to win 6.95
Metalist Kharkiv to win -160: risk 5 units to win 3.12
Metalist Kharkiv -1 +120: 6 units
Dead cats apparently have a reputation for bouncing.
The relevance to Villa after a home loss to Watford may not be clear, but it is perhaps in that light that one should consider this fact:
Villa's chances of staying up improved despite a home loss to Watford. Whether the change was major (it more than doubled!) or minor (the difference was 0.3%) is a question of the observer's perspective, but the fact remains: the club are in a slightly
YTD: 73-106, -189.96 units (-11.43%)
Reims to win +319: 5 units
Montpellier DNB +111: 6 units
Borussia M'gladbach to win -158: risk 6 units to win 3.79
Borussia M'gladbach -1 +112: 6 units
Real Sociedad +2 -101: risk 6 units to win 5.94
YTD: 69-100, -171.63 units (-11.06%)
Arsenal to win +222: 7 units
Arsenal DNB +130: 13 units
Nantes to win -142: risk 12 units to win 8.45
Nantes -1 +125: 11 units
YTD: 63-91, -161.37 units (-11.83%)
Hull +1 -105: risk 6 units to win 5.71
Southampton +1 -125: risk 8 units to win 6.40
WBA DNB +120: 6 units
Heerenveen DNB -135: risk 7 units to win 5.18
Atletico Madrid DNB -275: risk 7 units to win 2.54
Getting a draw against the league leaders was not enough to dramatically improve the Monte Carlo's estimations, but it didn't dramatically hurt things (not that things could have gotten much worse). This is not really a cause for pressing the panic button. The Monte Carlo's assessment is now just about solely based on the period when you could fairly say that other sides figured out Sherwood. Assuming that the level of performance Remi Garde brought out of the team is the new normal, as some
YTD: 64-94, -174.97 units (-12.47%)
Nantes DNB -105: risk 10 units to win 9.52
Heerenveen to win +115: 10 units
Heerenveen DNB -150: risk 13 units to win 8.66
YTD: 64-97, -207.97 units (-14.49%)
West Brom +1.5 -140: risk 10 units to win 7.14
Reims +1 -120: risk 8 units to win 6.66
Bayer Leverkusen to win -180: risk 12 units to win 6.66
Bayer Leverkusen -1 -105: risk 13 units to win 12.38
Twente -1 -135: risk 5 units to win 3.70
Antalyaspor DNB +140: 11 units
I want things to be stable, but not this kind of stable...
The good: Losing 4-0 to Everton didn't really hurt us.
The bad: It definitely didn't help us.
Our relgation chances stay the same, though the chances of finishing bottom increase somewhat.
17th 0.2% unchanged18th 2.1% -1.4%19th 10.2% -7.5%20th 87.5% +8.9% Median, most likelyVilla: 99.8% (unchanged)
Sunderland: 89.8% (-6.2%)
Bournemouth: 79.6% (-3.0%)
Newcastle: 18.0% (+11.8%)
YTD: 37-62, -173.50 units (-19.68%)
St. Gallen to win +155: 5 units
St. Gallen DNB -130: risk 9 units to win 6.92
Esbjerg +1 +105: 5 units
Slovan Liberec +0.5 +107: 7 units
Rijeka +0.5 +117: 7 units
Sheriff Tiraspol DNB +105: 7 units
Tromso +2.5 -105: risk 8 units to win 7.61
Shakhter Karagandy +1.5 -130: risk 6 units to win 4.61
YTD: 42-64, -156.48 units (-16.72%)
Arouca to win +480: 8 units
Akhisar Belediye to win +130: 16 units
Akhisar Belediye DNB -150: risk 24 units to win 16 units
YTD: 25-50, -165.24 units (-24.82%)
Returning from the international break...
Hertha Berlin to win +130: 8 units
Hertha Berlin DNB -150: risk 13 units to win 8.66
Antalyaspor +1 +103: 11 units
YTD: 36-54, -118.00 units (-14.59%)
Shakhtar Donetsk to win +250: 5 units
Olympiacos to win +275: 6 units
Olympiacos +0.5 -135: risk 9 units to win 6.66
CSKA Moscow +2 -105: risk 12 units to win 11.42
Viktoria Plzen to win +367: 5 units
YTD: 33-53, -133.10 units (-17.34%)
Kalloni to win +225: 6 units
Hellas Verona to win +110: 6 units
Hellas Verona DNB -180: risk 9 units to win 5.00
Rubin Kazan DNB -195: risk 10 units to win 5.12
Granada DNB -150: risk 10 units to win 6.66
YTD: 56-77, -113.71 units (-9.61%)
Amkar Perm DNB -175: risk 6 units to win 3.42
Betis to win +295: 7 units
Betis DNB +189: 11 units
Celta de Vigo DNB +155: 6 units
Espanyol +1 -150: risk 10 units to win 6.66
YTD: 37-58, -137.50 units (-16.26%)
Steaua Bucharest +1 +100: 9 units
Zenit St. Petersburg +1.5 -130: 9 units
Celtic +1 -105: risk 9 units to win 8.57
Ajax +2.5 +100: 8 units
It's a dog day afternoon for western hemisphere Champions League bettors...
YTD: 58-81, -130.64 units (-10.43%)
Marseille DNB -130: risk 5 units to win 3.84
Man City to win -195: risk 7 units to win 3.58
Man City -1 -110: risk 7 units to win 6.36
Freiburg +2 -125: risk 7 units to win 5.60
Napoli to win -130: risk 5 units to win 3.84
PSV DNB -180: risk 6 units to win 3.33
Maritimo DNB -175: risk 5 units to win 2.85
YTD: 61-87, -149.72 units (-11.42%)
Panaitolikos to win +265: 5 units
Heerenveen to win -125: risk 7 units to win 5.60
Heerenveen -1 +135: 6 units
Udinese DNB -110: risk 5 units to win 4.54
Torino +1 +100: 6 units
Lazio DNB -225: risk 5 units to win 2.22
Amkar Perm DNB +115: 9 units
YTD: 15-34, -127.44 units (-27.47%)
Hull +2 +200: 10 units
Norwich DNB +110: 8 units
Evian DNB +110: 5 units
Guingamp +2 -120: risk 8 units to win 6.66
Hannover DNB +110: 5 units
Hertha Berlin to win +280: 7 units
Added picks for later will be in the comments...
I understand that @Teale's 'tache, as in a lion outside the crestvor whatever as a stand-alone. Just seems odd to have the drop shadow yellow lion for example and a really detailed lion that is a different colour.
It makes plenty of sense, lots of brands have multiple variations of the same logo for various use cases. It's not a separate badge just a variation of. In this instance the detailed one seems to exist simply for protecting the trademark after that render with the gold lion appeared, I don't expect the detailed one to be used much because there aren't many use cases for it.
Also, remember none of these have been officially released, just trademarked, it's not like we are going around chucking 4/5 different crest on all of our branding. In fact, we've been very consistent in using the Lerner crest for everything apart from the kits and training gear, which is what we were told would happen. The 150 marque is being used as a marque should be, what we have control of, we have by and large controlled, but we can't control what others do so easily, at least not until we have just one crest as part of our brand that has had time to bed in.
I'm no fan of the new design, or the communication/process of it. In my opinion it isn't even the final form of whatever Heck and his team envisage the crest to finally be, it's just an evolution from the Lerner crest in the direction of that final form. It's a brand evolution rather than a revolution.
If I could choose out of any official use of any of our badges, it be this one in the bottom right. But the lion flipped (obvs)
To me, it ticks several boxes
clean, simple and legible 👍
looks like it’s been around forever (even tho it hasn’t) 👍
can scale and still be recognisable 👍
can be simplified and expanded for what ever the needs are 👍
no extra faff like stars, dates or “F.C.” 👍
Just nice rampant lion and Aston Villa
I would have to reluctantly swap Super John for Morty, I would have Giddy for Moreno and Ash for Bailey. Close call though, these replacements aren't as young as they once were.